I have been growing increasingly tired of the shrillness of the education debates online. But it has lead me to the all important question, first not who am I?, but what am I?
Am I a pro-reform educator? If you define reform as increasingly test score driven teacher evaluations as the path to education nirvana, no I am not. If you define reform as getting school districts to get courageous and create more options, empower teachers and admins, and make school an exciting place, yes I am pro-reform.
Am I an education reform critic, or a critic of education reform critics? I am a defender of nuance. My five years as a teacher in Baltimore in the 90s proved to me that unions sometimes protect incompetent teachers, principals do not always know what they are doing, and that good teachers and principals find ways to muddle through but most importantly not enough student needs are met by either side of the debate. Both sides of the debate need to find nuance, soon, and those of us with experience and intelligence are dying for some.
Am I progressive?
Am I a back to the basics educator?
Am I 21st century?
Am I an evangelist of anything in the education world?
Am I a Responsive Classroom principal?
Am I an Expeditionary learning principal?
Perhaps the more important question is who am I?
As a person who happens to be an educator I am sum of some sort addition of my beliefs and my actions, with my wonderful glaring faults thrown in as well.
I believe that it is my responsibility to make my patch of the world better than when I came to it, in my classrooms, in my schools, in my relationships, and in my neighborhood.
So what is better.
- More authentic educational experiences for students, teachers, and family members
- Better communication through community building and responsiveness, honestly and dialogue
- More empowering belief in one self through the teaching of all literacies
- More focus on the important things like developing a culture that supports intrinsic motivation and enjoyment of learning
I know, I know, lots of things that are hard to measure. But to make it happen requires a few things.
People in the school work way past their contract.
A solitary test score focus has to be co-opted into something bigger.
Policies need to be bent.
Asking forgiveness, instead of permission.
Having incredibly high expectations of the people you work with.
Things I am not certain either side of the reform debate would always support.
Sometimes I think I have become some sort of master of this type of leadership and I know a growing group of teachers and administrators around the glove have as well. I sometimes feel that my hands are tied by policies, sometimes by the policies intended to untie my hands.
We are the group who make the most in our classrooms or our schools while the ones with time on their hands bloviate endlessly about why their side is right.
We are the group who are making a difference while the nattering class keeps on nattering.
What should be call ourselves? Or does it even matter?
Interesting side note and full-disclosure- I am the principal of a school in formal school improvement with the state of Virginia for not meeting AYP in reading for several years. During the time of my leadership, reading and math scores have improved for all membership groups but not fast enough. That bothers me. During that time, our school climate has improved dramatically and the collective learning environment is one of the most vibrant in the area but I guess I am biased. In the three years school choice has been offered to all of our famlies, 1% of our school community has chosen to leave us. We continue to focus on improving the achievement of all of our students and making our school the best place for learning and growth it can be.